This evening I watched Shrink Rap, where Dr Pamela Stephenson - comedienne turned psychologist - interviewed Chris Langham, the actor who starred in the brilliant Thick of It.
Chris Langham was being interviewed because he had recently been convicted of downloading child porn to his computer and viewing it. He had served a prison term after pleading not guilty to all charges after claiming that he downloaded the images for 'research'. He also claimed that he had been abused as a child.
When the case was going on, I remember taking a hard line on the story, which is unlike me. Langham must have known what he was doing, and as a former vicitm of abuse he must have known the damage downloading such images perpetuates. He deserved everything he got, and more.
Having watched the programme, I now feel differently. I feel desperately sorry for him, and ashamed at my willingness to see things in black and white. Life is so often shades of grey.
I am at a loss to know what conclusion to draw, so let me draw several.
1. The media did not portray all the nuances of this story, which worries me.
2. Television is not a stupid medium.
3. People and life are complex; sometimes seeminly inexplicable actions happen. Where this is illegal, the perpetrator must be punished but sympathy can also be extended simultaneously.
4. Those who recognise these nuances and stand by people irrespective of their wrongdoing are brave.
5. As with the Mark of Cain, and the McCanns, I cannot help but think there but for the grace of God go I.
I am not arguing that he should not have been punished. But then neither is he. I am arguing news stories often get written as much for their saleability as their integrity. I am arguing that we instinctively make shortcuts to certainty.
I am arguing that we must collectively and individually guard against sanctimony, in a nuanced and complex world.
Tuesday, 15 January 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Brilliant.
Post a Comment